A Study on the Importance of Civil Rights and Judicial System Reform In India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/c6x72c72Keywords:
Civil Rights, Judicial System, Justice.Abstract
The Core of the Law Enforcement Framework Is A Sensible Procedure. The Law Enforcement Structure's Position Is To Offer Open Justice, Repel The Crook, And Ensure That The Process Is Completed Promptly Before The Observer's Memory Fades. Regardless, It Is A Well-Founded Source Of Concern That India's Law Enforcement Apparatus Is Gradually Crumbling. As a result, a genuine intention to evaluate the entire law enforcement organization is required. Particularly In The Field Of Police And Court Methodology For Assessing Wrongdoing As A Result, Courts Should Make An Ongoing Effort To Maintain Broad Societal Confidence In The Administration Of Justice By Assuring The Availability Of Fundamental Liberties In The Administration Of Criminal Justice. Since a result, the purpose of the paper is to comprehend the relationship between law enforcement structure and its evolution, as this is the primary means by which everyone involved in the administration of regulations can preserve their confidence.
Downloads
References
1. Arun Jaitley, the then Union Law Minister, “India’s Judicial Reforms,” R.N. Malhotra
Memorial Lecture, India International Centre, 14 February 2001.
2. Siddhartha Kumar and others v Upper Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ghazipur and
others, 1998 AWC593, Allahabad High Court
3. Dineshbhai Dhemenrai v. State of Gujarat, MANU/GJ/0421/2000
4. Thommen Kochu T, “Arrears in Courts: Measures to contain them”, (1983) 3 SCC
(Jour) 15.
5. Mohd. Shamim J., “How to clear the backlog of arrears of cases in courts?”, AIR 1994
(Jour) 129.
6. Chapter – II, Annual Report 2000-2001, Ministry of Home Affairs
7. Law Commission of India, 124th Report on the High Court Arrears – A Fresh Look,
1988.
8. “Delayed Justice,” Justice Sobhag Mal Jain Memorial Lecture delivered by the then
Chief Justice of India, Y. K. Sabharwal on 25 July 2006.
9. Exodus, 18.21-22.
10. It is a settled principle of law that some of the Fundamental Rights like 14 and 29 are
guaranteed even to noncitizens
11. For a detailed account of the taxonomy of the constitutional right to privacy in India
see, Mariyam Kamil, ‘The Structure of the Right to Privacy in India’ (MPhil thesis,
University of Oxford, 2015)
12. That was exactly the State’s submission in A.K. Gopalan’s case which unfortunately
found favour with this Court.
13. See Hans Muller of Nurenburg Vs. Superintendent, Presidency Jail, Calcutta and
Others AIR 1955 SC 367
14. The first 8 amendments to the Constitution are some of them.
15. Devika Biswas Vs. Union of India (2016) 10 SCC 726
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
