INDIA'S TRIBAL LAW: WHY AUTONOMOUS TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS ARE BETTER AND HOW DECENTRALIZED ADMINISTRATION IS EXTINGUISHING TRIBAL RIGHTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/n30yfh27Keywords:
tribal law ,tribal rights ,Autonomous ,PESAAbstract
India's populace incorporates around 100,000,000 ancestral individuals. The country's northeastern states, which line China and Burma, and the great nations and fields of peninsular India are the two main districts of tribal settlement. The last point is the focus of this paper. This territory is home to the majority of India's tribal peoples, who were just as of late acquainted with self-government when the Indian Parliament passed the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996. (PESA).
PESA requested states in peninsular India to deny certain political, definitive, and monetary powers to neighboring organizations picked by ancestral networks in their authoritative reach. The Act was adulated as one of the most unique regulations passed since autonomy, conceding ancestral gatherings' extreme components the power to safeguard their traditions and entrusting them with the master to deal with their gathering's resources. Notwithstanding, following the decade, obviously PESA has neglected to meet those goals. Clans have been forced to establish their character and rights as a result of blatant invasion of tribal interests and the state administration's hesitancy (at times, sheer dawdling) in surrendering experts. Tribal strife has wreaked havoc in these districts, and maverick groups such as the Nasals have developed into a serious threat to India's national security.
Downloads
References
1. Kapur, Radhika. *Indian Society—Urban, Rural, and Tribal.* March 2018. Accessed August 3, 2019. [Source](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323691689_Indian_Society_-_Urban_Rural_and_Tribal).
2. Sindhi, Swaleha. *Prospects and Challenges in Empowerment of Tribal Women.* *IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences*, 6(1): 46-54, Nov.–Dec. 2012. Accessed August 3, 2019. [Source](http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol6-issue1/G0614654.pdf?id=5913).
3. Kurup, Apoorv. *Tribal Law in India: How Decentralized Administration Is Extinguishing Tribal Rights and Why Autonomous Tribal Governments are Better.* *Indigenous Law Journal*, 1(1): 87-126, 2008. Accessed August 3, 2019. [Source](https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/17375/1/ILJ-7.1-Kurup.pdf).
4. Tripathi, Prakash. *Tribes and Forest: A Critical Appraisal of the Tribal Forest Right in India.* *Research Journal of Social Science and Management*, 6(6), October 2016. Accessed August 3, 2019. [Source](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308794288_Tribes_and_Forest_A_critical_appraisal_of_the_tribal_forest_right_in_India).
5. Krishnan, P. G. *Constitution and Tribal Welfare.* *Cochin University Law Review*, 9: 49-66, 1985. Accessed August 3, 2019. [Source](http://dspace.cusat.ac.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/11219/1/Constitution%20and%20Tribal%20Welfare.PDF).
6. Sarkar, Badal. *Constitutional Provisions for Tribal Development in India.* *Political Science*, 3(2): 280-282, February 2014. Accessed August 3, 2019. [Source](https://www.worldwidejournals.com/paripex/recent_issues_pdf/2014/February/February_2014_1392785388_5ba62_105.Dr.%20Badal%20Sarkar.pdf).
7. Mohapatra, Gadadhara. *Decentralised Governance and Tribal Development in Scheduled Areas of Northeast India: A Case Study of the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council.* *Indian Journal of Public Administration*, 63(3), September 19, 2017. Accessed August 3, 2019. [Source](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0019556117720616).
8. Jha, Shefali. *Representation and Its Epiphanies.* *Economic and Political Weekly*, 39(39), September 25, 2004. Accessed August 4, 2019. [Source](https://www.epw.in/journal/2004/39/special-articles/representationand-its-epiphanies.html).
9. Elder, Joseph W. *Hinduism, Modernity, and Knowledge: India.* In *Springer International Handbook on Education*, 22: 873-887, 2009. Accessed August 4, 2019. [Source](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-6403-6_56).
10. Banerjee, Prathama. *Writing the Adivasi: Some Historiographical Notes.* *The Indian Economic and Social History Review*, 53(1): 1-23, 2016. Accessed August 4, 2019. [Source](https://www.csds.in/uploads/custom_files/1526966373_Writing%20the%20Adivasi.pdf).
11. Babcock, Hope. *A Possible Solution to the Problem of Diminishing Tribal Sovereignty.* *North Dakota Law Review*, 90(1): 13-86, 2014. Accessed August 2, 2019. [Source](https://law.und.edu/_files/docs/ndlr/pdf/issues/90/1/90ndlr13.pdf).
12. Ranganatha, B. *Tribal Identity and the Implications for Political and Cultural Development: A Sociological Analysis.* *International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering*, 2(1): 27-40, April 2014. Accessed August 2, 2019. DOI 10.5958/2322-0465.2014.01115.0. [Source](https://ndpublisher.in/admin/issues/IJASEV2N1d.pdf).
13. Bijoy, C. R. *The Adivasis of India: A History of Discrimination, Conflict, and Resistance.*
14. *Constitution of India.*
15. Panchayat (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
