EFFECTS OF OUTSOURCING DECISION ON ORGANISATION PERFORMANCE IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY CASE OF UNILEVER GROUP LIMITED IN INDIA

Authors

  • Ankurita Bansal Guru Kashi University, Talwandi Sabo Author
  • Kavita Guru Kashi University, Talwandi Sabo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/frh42028

Keywords:

outsourcing, organization performance, decision, manufacturing industry

Abstract

Firms have always sought ways to gain a competitive advantage over their competitors; one avenue that firms have pursued to improve their competitive position in this new business environment has been to increase the role of outsourcing in their operations, which has been found to provide a competitive advantage and heightened performance to these firms. The study therefore was purposed to establish the effect of outsourcing decisions on the organizational performance of the manufacturing industry, using India Unilever Group Limited as a case study. Information technology adoption, cost reduction and top management support and commitment were positively correlated to organization performance The study recommends that the management should take into account the variables considered since the results show that there is a significant relationship between the predictors of information technology adoption, top management support and commitment, focus on core competencies and cost reduction (taken together), and organization performance in Indian manufacturing firms. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Burke, R. J., & Ng, E. "The Changing Nature of Work and Organizations: Implications for Human Resource Management." *Human Resource Management Review*, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 86-94, 2006.

2. Calantone, R. J., & Stanko, M. "Drivers of Outsourced Innovation: An Exploratory Study." *Journal of Product Innovation Management*, 24, 230–241, 2007.

3. Cannon, D. "Keeping Outsourcing in Hand." *Chief Executive*, November-December: 38, 2009.

4. Cappelli, P. "Rethinking Employment." British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33 (4), 563-602, 1995.

5. Cánez, L. E., Platts, K. W., & Probert, D. R. "Developing a Framework for Make-or-Buy Decisions." *International Journal of Operations & Product Management*, Vol. 20, Issue 11, pp. 1313-1330, 2000.

6. Chandler, M. *Management Rights and Union Interests*. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004.

7. Chiesa, B., Catchpowle, L., & Hall, D. "Outsourcing and Offshoring." *CES Info Forum*, 2/2004, pp. 17-21.

8. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. *Business Research Methods* (10th ed.). McGraw Hill, International Edition, 2000.

9. Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. "A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice." *Administrative Science Quarterly*, 17, 1–25, 1972.

10. Croom, S. R. "The Impact of Web-Based Procurement on the Management of Operating Resources Supply." *The Journal of Supply Chain Management*, 36(1), 2000.

11. Dublin, M., & Cranfield, P. "IT Backsourcing: From 'Make or Buy' to 'Bringing it Back In-House'," 2006.

12. Dekkers, G. G. "The New Corporate Architecture." *Academy of Management Executive*, 9(3), 2000.

13. Dess, G. G., Rasheed, A., McLaughlin, K., & Priem, R. "The New Corporate Architecture." *Academy of Management Executive*, 9(3), 1995.

14. Doz, Y. L., & Baburoglu, O. "From Competition to Collaboration: The Emergence and Evolution of R&D Cooperatives." In David O. Faulkner & Mark de Rond (Eds.), *Cooperative Strategy: Economic, Business, and Organisational Issues. Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.

15. Dyer, J., & Singh, H. "The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage." *Academy of Management Review*, 1998.

16. Elmuti, D., & Kathawala, Y. "The Effects of Global Outsourcing Strategies Participants' Attitudes and Organizational Effectiveness." *International Journal of Manpower*, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 112-28, 2000.

17. Embleton & Wright, "A Practical Guide to Successful Outsourcing." *Empowerment in Organizations*, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 94-106, 1998.

18. Enrique, C., Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. "Information Systems Outsourcing: Reasons, Reservations, and Success Factors." *Logistics Information Management*, Vol. 15, 2002.

19. Farag, N. I., & Krishnan, M. S. "The Market Value of IT Outsourcing Investment Announcements: An Event-Study Analysis." In D. Galletta & J. Ross (Eds.), *Proceedings of the 9th Americas Conference on Information Systems*, pp. 1623-1629, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, 2003.

20. Feeny, Lacity, & Wilcocks, "Taking the Measure of Outsourcing Providers." *MIT Sloan Management Review*, Spring, 2005.

21. Field, N. I., "The Market Value of Research," Association for Information Systems, 2005.

22. Ford, J. W., Joseph, M., & Joseph, B. "Service Quality in Higher Education: A Comparison of Universities in the US and New Zealand Using SERVQUAL." *Unpublished manuscript*, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 1993.

23. Gallivan, M. J., & Kim, J. W. "The Market's Perception of the Transactional Risks of Information Technology Outsourcing Announcements." *Journal of Management*, 26(4), 2006.

24. Powell, G. N. *Managing a Diverse Workforce: Learning Activities* (2nd ed.), 2004.

25. Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. "Information Systems Outsourcing Reasons and Risks: An Empirical Study." *International Journal of Social Science*, 4(3), 2009.

26. Gopal, C., & Gagnon, J. "Knowledge, Information, Learning, and the IS Manager." *Computer World*, vol. 29 No. 25, 1995.

27. Harris, P. "Outsourced Learning: A New Market Emerges." *Training and Development*, 57(9), 30-38, 2008.

28. Harrison, B., & Kelley, M. "Outsourcing and the Search for Flexibility." *Work, Employment & Society*, 7(2), 213-235, 2003.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2021

How to Cite

EFFECTS OF OUTSOURCING DECISION ON ORGANISATION PERFORMANCE IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY CASE OF UNILEVER GROUP LIMITED IN INDIA. (2021). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 25(3), 1205-1214. https://doi.org/10.61841/frh42028