Institutional Factor of Sustainable Development of the Countries in Eastern Europe: Methodological Aspect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/y12sqq55Keywords:
Development, Economic Growth, Sustainable Development, Instability, Sustainability Strategy, Countries of Eastern Europe.Abstract
The formation of a new system of political relations in Eastern Europe has a number of features that are insufficient to determine the qualities of the previous era. The study of the positive and negative experience of democratic transit and the subsequent consolidation of democracy in the countries of the region is of interest from the point of view of developing new approaches to the study of transition problems. The study of national models of transition to democracy raises a very important question about the adequacy of the choice of ways to consolidate democracy. Realization of sustainable development goals is a spatially differentiated and cyclical process. In some countries, the movement towards sustainability is faster than in others. Many developed and developing countries have adopted sustainable development policies, ratified international treaties, and made commitments. In others, the concept of “sustainable development” is an abstraction that is remote from the real life of people. A special place in the implementation of sustainable development strategies is held by the countries of Eastern Europe. The article touches upon modern problems of the development of territorial systems. The necessity of the transition from the paradigm of "instability" to the concept of sustainable development is shown. The main provisions of the integral concept of sustainable development and its significance for the future evolution of territories are characterized. The main factors and causes of global environmental, economic and social instability are analyzed. The features of the implementation of the concept of sustainability in the countries of Eastern Europe are characterized.
Downloads
References
[1] Antoni-Komar, I., Lautermann, C., &Pfriem, R. (2012).Unternehmen und Konsumenten in
Verantwortungsgemeinschaftjenseits des Konsumismus: Nachhaltigkeiterfordert, das
Zusammenwirkenzwischen Produzieren und Konsumierenneuzudenken. Zeitschriftfür Wirtschafts-und
Unternehmensethik, 13 (3), 297-316.
[2] Barmuta, K., Ponkratov, V., Maramygin, M., Kuznetsov, N., Ivlev, V., &Ivleva, M. (2019).Mathematical
model of optimizing the balance sheet structure of the Russian banking system with allowance for the
foreign exchange risk levels. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 484-497.
[3] Hails, C., Humphrey, S., Loh, J., Goldfinger, S., Chapagain, A., Bourne, G., & Collen, B. (2008). Living
planet report 2008.
[4] Ibatova, A.Z., Sitdikov, F.F., & Klychova, G.S. (2018).Reporting in the area of sustainable development
with information technology application. Management Science Letters, 8(7), 785-794.
[5] Kovalev, Yu. Yu. (2014). The concept of sustainable development and its implementation in the European
Union. News of the Ural Federal University.Series 3. Social Sciences, 9 (4), 54-66.
[6] Laurent, E. (2012). Demokratisch-gerecht-nachhaltig: Die Perspektive der Sozial-Ökologie. Rotpunktverlag.
[7] Melguy, A.E., Kovaleva, N.N., &Dvoretskaya, Yu. A. (2015). Taxation of property of individuals: a
regional aspect. Bulletin of the Bryansk State University, (3).
[8] Paveliev, E.A., & Sidorova, T. Yu. (2015). Using the institute of honorary consuls to deepen integration
processes in relations between states. Siberian Law Journal, (1).
[9] Pavlyuk, A.V., Hasanov, E.L., Sverdlikova, E.A., & Kadyrov, M.A. (2018). Institutional mechanisms for
implementation of entrepreneurial potential of the population of the region. Journal of Applied Economic
Sciences, 13(7), 2052-2075.
[10] Pufé, I. (2012). Nachhaltigkeit, Konstanz.
[11] Sharafutdinov, R.I., Polyakova, A.G., Gerasimov, V.O., Shpakova, R.N., &Mikhailova, M.V. (2019).
Inclusive growth: A dataset on key and institutional foundations for inclusive development of Russian
regions. Data in Brief, 23.
[12] Yakovets, Yu.V. (2004). Mythic innovations of the XXI century.
[13] Zaitsev, A.V. (2011). The Lisbon Treaty and the institutionalization of civil dialogue in the European Union.
Society: politics, economics, law, (4).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
