Applied Contingency Table with Qualitative Focus Group on Occupational Health and Safety Management Perceptions of Operation and Leader in Medium Construction

Authors

  • Kanchana Daoden Smart Electronics Engineering, Industrial Arts Program Faculty of Industrial Technology, Uttaradit Rajabhat University, Thailand Author
  • Thuttha Kornpitak Smart Electronics Engineering, Industrial Arts Program Faculty of Industrial Technology, Uttaradit Rajabhat University, Thailand. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/7e1sm180

Keywords:

Focus groups, Qualitative research, Workplace accident, Construction enterprise.

Abstract

 Prevention and management health and risk of the workers which involved construction firms were realized that higher than other divisions and acknowledged in different contexts. However, it is a fewer phenomenon which the workers will attend to the organization in preventing and managing strategies of their health and risks instead of roughly regulate from the centralized policy. In this current study, we explored the interrelation of major factors, including how it affected the decision making of worker and organization attitudes when dealt with accident and hazard in the workplace. Moreover, we focus on the individual characteristics of the worker for accidental risk perception under the organization.

 

Methods: An individual basic information questionnaire, risk behavior perception questionnaires, short interview and a focus group study performed with a sample of 150 participants; workers, head workers, officers, managers, and executives division aged between 18–69 years of medium enterprises. The participants divided into two main groups as 60 peoples of the leader (policy) group and 90 peoples of operation groups. Both groups randomized from 3 small provinces of northern Thailand. All of them will receive a specific questionnaire regard to their opinion and vision on accident hazards in the workplace (protection plan and responsibility). After that, the operation groups will divide into ten focus groups and six of leader groups The participants in each operation group will be encouraged to express their views about their hazard experiences and propose the ways to reduces accident in the workplace and summarize the group's comments to share the point of view to other groups. The analysis was conducted by thematic method and descriptive statistics, searching for significant factors and themes describing the participants’ experiences.

 

Results: Five main themes of operation groups occurred for anticipating and dealing with accidents during work: (1) appropriate working conditions/environment, (2) prepare for occurring events, (3) having clear OSH policy, (4) assign proper work, and (5) representative manager response. In case of leader groups four general themes emerged during discussion: (1) preparing/readiness of the workers, (2) work skills, (3) working time, and (4) workplace conditions.

 

Conclusion: The results show different concepts in dealing with dangerous situations or accidents that may occur during the work of both groups. (Workers and Leaders), where workers are recognized and aware of the risks that are nearby them like the work environment, then expand to other topics while the leader group will see the opposite. Most of the leaders misunderstood about roles and responsibilities for health and safety at work, including lack of sincerity, no commitment to action, and may not truly realize the consequences of not paying attention to preventing and reducing accidents during actual work of the company. The study shows the potential to develop better organizational strategies based on the worker's aspects, together with policymakers, to prevent the accidental risk from working. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Acocella, I, The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages, Quality & Quantity, 46 (4),

1125-1136, 2012.

[2] Administrative Division, Office of Permanent Secretary, and Ministry of Public Health. Geographic

information system for human resources, fiscal year 2013. Thailand: Ministry of Public Health; 2013.

[3] Asbury, J.-E. (1995). Overview of Focus Group Research. Qualitative Health Research. 5 (4), 414-420.

[4] ASEAN Legal Database. ASEAN Members Legislation, Law by category, Labour and Social Welfare

[Internet]. Bangkok (Thailand): The Senate acting as the Secretariat of the National Legislative Assembly.

2017 [cited 2019 Jul 20]. Available from: http://asean- law.senate.go.th/en/subject-selecten.php?sgid=16&sid=67

Bright, Melissa A. and O’Connor, Dawn, "Qualitative Data Analysis: Comparison Between Traditional and

Computerized Text Analysis" (2007). All Volumes (2001-2008). 21.

[5] Bureau of Occupational and Environmental Diseases (BOED). Department of Disease Control, Ministry of

Public Health, Thailand: Ministry of Public Health. 2019.

[6] Bureau of Policy and Strategy, Ministry of Public Health (Thailand), Ministry of Interior (Thailand),

Ministry of Public Health (Thailand), National Statistical Office (Thailand). Thailand Public Health

Statistics 2015. Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Public Health (Thailand), 2016.

[7] Bureau of Occupational and Environmental Diseases, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public

Health. Manual of risk and working condition assessment for healthcare workers 2554. Thailand: Ministry

of Public Health; 2010.

[8] Ministerial Regulations, Specification of administration standard and the process of safety, industrial

hygiene and environment at workplace, BE 2549 (2006)

[9] Bureau of Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Labor Protection and Welfare, Ministry of Labor.

Occupational safety, health and environment act B.E. 2554. Thailand: Ministry of Labor; 2011.

[10] Bureau of Policy and Strategy and Ministry of Public Health. Healthcare system in Thailand. Thailand:

Ministry of Public Heath; 2013.

[11] Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. (3rd ed.). New

York: McGraw-Hill.

[12] European Commission. [accessed 27 October 2014] Occupational health and safety risks in the healthcare

sector: guide to prevention and good practices. 2010. https://bookshop.europa.eu/en/occupational-healthandSafety-risks-in-the-healthcare-sector-pbKE3111047/

Franz, N.K. (2011). The unfocused focus group: benefit or bane? Qualitative Report, 16 (5), 1380-1388.

[13] Injury or accidental work information. National Statistical Office. Labour Force Survey 2013-2017. 2015.

[14] Kogi K. Work improvement and occupational safety and health management systems: common features and

research needs. Ind Health. 2002; 40:121-133.

[15] Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. 4th Ed. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

[16] Lawani, K., Hare, B., Cameron, I. & Dick, S., Management’s ‘Genuine Benevolence’ & Worker

Commitment to Health & Safety – A Qualitative Study. Salvador, Bahia, Marketing Aumentado, pp. 318-

326. 2018.

[17] Markkanen P, Quinn M, Galligan C, et al. P6-3 Combining qualitative and quantitative research methods to

assess occupational exposures and interventions among homecare aides Occupational and Environmental

Medicine 2016;73:A94.

[18] Morgan, D.L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage.

[19] Onwuegbuzie, A., Dickinson, W.B., Leech, N.L. & Zoran, A.G. (2009). A Qualitative Framework for

Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8

(3), 1-21.

[20] P.M. Smith, R. Saunders, M. Lifshen, O. Black, M. Lay, F.C. Breslin, A.D.M. Montagne, E. Tompa. The

development of a conceptual model and self-reported measure of occupational health and safety

vulnerability. Accident Anal. Prevent., 82 (2015), pp. 234-243.

[21] Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[22] Polivka, B. J., Wills, C. E., Darragh, A., Lavender, S., Sommerich, C., & Stredney, D. (2015).

Environmental Health and Safety Hazards Experienced by Home Health Care Providers: A Room-by-Room

Analysis. Workplace Health & Safety, 63(11), 512–522.

[23] Quinn MM, Markkanen PK, Galligan CJ, et al Occupational health of home care aides: results of the safe

home care surveyOccupational and Environmental Medicine 2016;73:237-245.

[24] R.M. Dilshad, M.I. Latif. Focus group interview as a tool for qualitative research: an analysis. Pak J Soc Sci,

3 (1) (2013), pp. 191-198.

[25] Smithson, J. (2008). Focus groups. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research.

2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

[26] Social Security Office. Office of Workmen's compensation Fund of Thailand on the statistics of

occupational hazards or illnesses nationwide years 2013-2017. Ministry of Labor. 2017.

[27] Stewart, D.W. & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practices. Newbury Park: Sage.

[28] The Declaration of Brussels, International Social Security Association-section on prevention in construction [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): International Social Security Association. 2009 [cited 2009 Nov 25].

Available from: http://www.issa.int/Resources/Resources/The-Declaration- of-Brussels.

[29] Wichairum S. 2009. A Study of Risk Factors of Construction Workers. Master Thesis of Science.

Department of Engineering Management. Graduate School. Dhurakij Pundit University.

[30] Willis, K., Green, J., Daly, J., Williamson, L. & Bandyopadhyay, M. (2008). Perils and possibilities:

achieving best evidence from focus groups in public health research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of

Public Health, 33, 131-6.

[31] Wipfli, B., Olson, R., Wright, R. R., Garrigues, L., Lees, J. (2012). Characterizing hazards and injuries

among home care workers. Home Healthcare Nurse, 30, 387-393.

Downloads

Published

18.09.2024

How to Cite

Applied Contingency Table with Qualitative Focus Group on Occupational Health and Safety Management Perceptions of Operation and Leader in Medium Construction. (2024). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(1), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.61841/7e1sm180