First Year International Students’ Experience in Universiti Malaysia Sabah

Authors

  • Hasbullah Bin Awang Labuan Faculty of International Finance, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Author
  • Irma Wani Othman Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning, Universiti Malaysia Sabah Author
  • Norazah Mohd Suki Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/vk362x90

Keywords:

International Students, UMS

Abstract

Internationalization is considered an efficient step to increase international students’ enrolment in Malaysia to fulfill the national aspiration of becoming a higher learning hub of excellence worldwide. This study explores the first-year experiences of international students by investigating the influencing factors on their decision to further study and their adaptation to the new environment at UMS. A qualitative research design using a case study that involved 20 international students who were selected using purposive sampling was carried out. A semistructured interview was used to gather information from these respondents. Based on the analysis of collected data, five themes were identified as the influencing factors on their decision to further study at UMS, which are: academic, culture, financial, university services, and social. These themes were further divided into sub-themes. Among them are the advantages and disadvantages of studying in UMS, education system differences, education program variety, educational course syllabus, and mastery of English language under the academic theme. The culture theme was divided into sub-themes like new experience, UMS culture, and external world view, while the financial theme is divided into financial resources from family and scholarship awards. University services are divided into two sub-themes: facilities and infrastructure and international office. Further to that, the social theme is represented by three subthemes comprising of parents and friends’ recommendations, social integration development, and the local community and college environment. Findings also presented the respondents’ view on the international students’ adaptation to the new environment. These were represented by eight themes, which are: mastery of the English language, group assignment, and instructional quality of academicians; cultural shock; adventure and gaining new experience; food access; satisfaction with facilities and infrastructure; and international student safety. Overall, feedback from the international students implied their satisfaction and positive first-year experience at UMS. Findings from this study are hoped to contribute to the Higher Education Ministry and UMS management in promoting greater enrolment and portraying UMS as the prime choice of study destination among international students. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] American Council on Education, ACE. (2015). Internationalization in Action. Retrieved from

https://www.acenet.edu/newsroom/Pages/Internationalization-in-Action.aspx

[2] Ahmad, S. Z., & Buchanan, F. R. (2016). Choices of destination for transnational higher education: “Pull”

factors in an Asia Pacific market. Educational Studies, 42(2), 163–180.

[3] Clavel, T (2015). 'Culture, cost and proximity draw Chinese students to Japan', The Japan Times,22 April,

viewed 1 July 2015, <http://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2015/04/22/issues/culture-cost-proximitydraw-chinese-students-japan/#.VZPZsUYnIXx>.

[4] Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.

Sage,Oaks.

[5] Huang, Y. 2012. “Transitioning Challenges Faced by Chinese Graduate Students.” Adult Learning 23:

138–147.

[6] Institute of International Education (IIE). (2016). International students by primary source of funding,

2015/16 [data set]. Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange.

[7] Jobbins, D 2015, 'Foreign students add to campus attraction', University World News, no. 360, viewed 28

March 2015

[8] Knight, J. (2015). International universities: Misunderstandings and emerging models. Journal of Studies in

International Education, 19, 107−121.

[9] Koe, W.L. & Siti Noraisah Saring. 2012. Factors Influencing the Foreign Undergraduates' Intention to

Study at Graduate School of a Public University. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Jurnal Kemanusiaan19:

57-68

[10] Lee, C-F (2014). 'An Investigation of Factors Determining the Study Abroad Destination Choice: A Case

Study of Taiwan', Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 362-81.

[11] Lee, J., & Ciftci, A. (2014). Asian international students’ sociocultural adaptation: Influence of

multicultural personality, assertiveness, academic self-efficacy, and social support. International Journal of

Intercultural Relations, 38, 97–105.

[12] Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations

for Designing and Reviewing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Promoting Methodological Integrity.

Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2–22.

[13] Liao, K. Y.-H., & Wei, M. (2014). Academic stress and positive affect: Asian value and self-worth

contingency as moderators among Chinese international students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority

Psychology, 20(1), 107-115.

[14] Li, J., Wang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, Y., & Cui, T. (2018). Academic adaptation among international students from

East Asian Countries: A consensual qualitative research. Journal of International Students,8(1), 194–214.

[15] Liew Chei Siang. 2012. Analisis Kepuasan Terhadap Program Pengajian Dalam Kalangan Pelajar

Antarabangsa Di Malaysia. Prosiding PERKEM VII, 2, 1019–1031.

[16] Lowinger, R., He, Z., Lin, M., & Chang, M. (2014). The impact of academic self-efficacy, acculturation

difficulties, and language abilities on procrastination behavior in Chinese international students. College

Student Journal, 48(1), 141–152.

[17] Mustaffa, C.S., & Illias, M. (2013). Relationship between student’s adjustment factor and cross-cultural

adjustment: A survey at the Northern University of Malaysia. Intercultural Communication Studies22(1):

279-300

[18] Mustaffa, E. (2016). Food acculturation of new international student in the UK (Doctoral dissertation,

University of Surrey).

[19] Ortiz, A. (2015). New study: How international bachelor’s students choose institutions.

WorldEducationServices.

[20] Perez-Encinas, A., & Rodriguez-Pomeda, J. (2018). International students’ perceptions of their needs when

going abroad: Services on demand. Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(1), 20–36

[21] Suryandari, R., Jaafar, M., & Hamzah, N. (2014). Mengantarabangsakan Ruang Pendidikan Tinggi

Malaysia: Pengalaman. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 10(3), 60-72.

[22] Valka, S. (2015). Management of International Students’ Academic Adjustment: Challenges and Solutions.

European Scientific Journal.

[23] Wan, R., Nordin, S. M., & Razali, R. (2013). International students’ cultural experiences: Exploring sociocultural and academic adjustment in Malaysian Universities. Recent Advances in Modern Educational

Technologies, 31–37.

[24] www.ukm.my(2015)Available from: http://www.ukm.my/news/Latest_News/bilangan-pelajarantarabangsa-di-malaysia-naik-100-menjelang-2020-pm/

[25] Yale, B. (2017). Understanding Culture Shock in International Students. Available @.

http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising-Today/ViewArticles/Understanding-CultureShock-in-InternationalStudents.aspx

[26] Yusliza M. Y (2012). Self-Efficacy, Perceived Social Support and Psychological Adjustment in

International Undergraduate Students in a Public Higher Education Institution in Malaysia. Journal of

Studies in International Education.

[27] Zeeshan, M., Sabbar, S., Bashir, S., & Hussain, R. (2013). FOREIGN STUDENTS‟MOTIVATION FOR

STUDYING IN MALAYSIA. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(3), 833-846.

Downloads

Published

31.05.2019

How to Cite

First Year International Students’ Experience in Universiti Malaysia Sabah. (2019). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(2), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.61841/vk362x90