Do Leadership and Effective Internal Communication Strategies Really Matters? Insights from MNCs in the Malaysian Hospitality Industry

Authors

  • Iftekhar Amin Chowdhury Labuan Faculty of International Finance, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Labuan International Campus, Jalan Sungai Pagar, 87000 Labuan F.T., Malaysia. Author
  • Norazah Mohd Suki Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 UUM Sintok, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia. Author
  • Mohd. Rizal Abd Hamid,Labuan Faculty of International Finance, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Labuan International Campus, Jalan Sungai Pagar, 87000 Labuan F.T., Malaysia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/tkcyvw08

Keywords:

Leadership, Internal Communication, Hospitality, Strategies, Leader-Manager Exchange, Business

Abstract

Studies on communication within MNCs and the effect on the global marketplace began as early as the 1970s. Leadership competencies have a profound impact on the type of communication strategies deployed within an organization. The purpose of this qualitative phenomenological study is to explore effective internal communication strategies used by leaders of MNCs in the hospitality industry in Malaysia. This conceptual study depicts the effect of leadership style on communication that occurs between leaders and subordinates via the leader-manager exchange (LMX) and the effect on the quality of communication. The aim of this research is to examine the relationship between the LMX and leadership strategy and the relevant linkage to communication within the multinational hospitality organizations in Malaysia. The research design that has been selected for this study is the interview of purposefully selected hospitality industry professionals in a leadership role. During the interview process, the study will use open-ended questions to allow participants to control responses and respond to follow-up questions. The interview sessions will be one-on-one closed sessions with industry leaders. The goal is to achieve a minimum sample size of 10 participants for the study. Research for this study will take place in a neutral setting away from daily business operations with the leaders from MNCs in the Malaysian hospitality industry. The qualitative software tool, Nvivo 11, will be the primary source for collecting and analyzing the data. It is expected that the participants will express their views that effective communication strategies between leaders and subordinates in the LMX influence productivity either positively or negatively 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Antonakis, J. & House, R.J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of

transformational-transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 746-771. doi:

10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.005

[2] Arbnor, I. & Bjerke, B. (2009). Methodology for creating business knowledge (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks,

CA: Sage Publications.

[3] Calvano, L. (2008). Multinational corporations and local communities: A critical analysis of conflict.

Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 793-805. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9593-z

[4] CHA International. (2013). The employee turnover? The challenge. Retrieved from http://chainternational.com/The-Hotel-Employer-Turnover

[5] Chaurasia, S. & Shukla, A. (2014). Psychological capital, LMX, employee engagement & work role

performance. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 50, 342-356. Retrieved from

http://www.publishingindia.com/ijir

[6] Choudhary, A.I., Akhtar, S.A., & Zaheer, A. (2013). Impact of transformational and servant leadership on

organizational performance: A comparative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 433-440.

doi:10.1007/s1055-012-1470-8

[7] Cooper, C. & Schindler, P. (2014). Business research methods (12th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill

Irwin.

[8] Dansereau, F., Graen, G.B., &Haga, W. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal

organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78. Retrieved from

http://sciencedirect.com

[9] Dawidziuk, M., Boboryko-Hocazade, J., & Mazur, B. (2012). The intercultural competencies of the

managers and organization in the global world. Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society.

Proceedings, 3, 117-120. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com

[10] Department for Work and Pension. (2011). Good practice case studies: Managing without fixed retirement

age. Retrieved from http://www.dwp.gov.uk

[11] Dibble R. & Gibson, C. (2013). Collaboration for the common good: An examination of challenges and

adjustment processes in multicultural collaborations. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 34, 764-790.

doi:10.1002/job.1872.

[12] Dinh, J.E., Lord, R.G., Gardner, W.L., Meuser, J.D., Liden, R.C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and

research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership

Quarterly, 25(1), 36-62. doi:10.1016/j.leaqu.2013.11.005

[13] Dukes, S. (1984). Phenomenological methodology in the human sciences. Journal of Religion and Health,

23, 197-203. doi:10.1007/BF00990785

[14] Dusek, G.A., Ruppel, C.P., Yurova, Y., & Clarke, R. (2014). The role of employee service orientation in

turnover in the U.S. hotel industry. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications, and Conflict,

18(2), 87-104. Retrieved from http://abacademies.org

[15] Ford, J., & Harding, N. (2011). The impossibility of the “true self” of authentic. Leadership, 7, 463-479.

doi:10.1177/1742715011416894

[16] Gallagher, S. &Zahavi, D. (2012). The phenomenological mind (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

[17] Garg, S. & Dhar, R.L. (2014). Effects of stress, LMX, and perceived organizational support on service

quality: Mediating effects of organizational commitment. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management,

21, 64-75. doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2014.07.002

[18] Gatlin-Watts, R., Jara Valls, M., & Mendoza, M.P. (2013). Communicating across borders: A guide.

Journal of Business & Behavioral Sciences, 25(2), 83-91. Retrieved from http://www.asbbs.org

[19] Graen, G.B., &Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leadermember exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain

perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5

[20] Jain, N.K., Srivastava, P., & Owens, D.L. (2014). Leader-member exchange and resource accessibility of

subordinates: Perception towards MNC global integration strategy. Leadership & Organizational

Development Journal, 35, 494-512. doi:10.1108/LODJ-09-2012-0112

[21] Jaiswal, N.K. & Dhar, R.L. (2015). Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy

and employee creativity: A multilevel study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 30-41.

doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.07.002

[22] Karatepe, O.M., &Douri, B.G. (2012). Does customer orientation mediate the effect of job resourcefulness

on hotel employee outcomes? Evidence from Iran.Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 19(1),

133-142. doi:10.1017/jht.2012.15

[23] Laschinger, H.K.S., &Fida, R. (2014). New nurses’ burnout and workplace well-being: The influence of

authentic leadership and psychological capital. Burnout Research,1(1), 19-28.

doi:10.1016/j.burn.2014.03.002

[24] Lindsey Hall, K.K., Baker, T.L., Andrews, M.C., Hunt, T.G., & Rapp, A.A. (2016). The importance of

product/service quality for frontline marketing employee outcomes: the moderating effect of leadermember exchange (LMX). Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 24(1), 23-41.

[25] Manduca, B. (2012). Leading effective change: Three keys for transforming your organization. Strategic

Leadership Review, 2(2), 28-34. Retrieved from

[26] McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership

development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 117-130. Retrieved from http://www.jbsq.org

[27] Michael, D.F. (2014). The impact of leader-member exchange, supportive supervisor communication,

affective commitment, and role ambiguity on bank employees’ turnover intentions and performance.

International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(7), 8-21. Retrieved from http://ijbssnet.com

[28] Mishra, K., Boynton, L., & Mishra, A. (2014). Driving employee engagement: The expanded role of

internal communications. Journal of Business Communication, 51, 183-202.

[29] Mohammed, L.M. (2016). Assessing the effects of transformational leadership: A study on Egyptian hotel

employees. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management,27, 49-59. Retrieved from

30] Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

[31] Murphy, S.E., & Johnson, S.K. (2011). The benefits of a long-lens approach to leader development:

Understanding the seeds of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 459-470.

doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.04.004

[32] Nakata, C. &Im, S. (2010). Spurring cross-functional integration for higher new product performance: a

group effectiveness perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 554-571.

doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00735.x

[33] Parris, D.L., & Peachey, J.W. (2012). A systematic literature review of servant Leadership theory in

organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 377-393. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1322-6

[34] Polkinghorne, D.E. (1998). Phenomenological research methods. In R.S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds).

Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41-60). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

[35] Quintana, T.A., Park, S. & Cabrera, Y.A. (2015). Assessing the effects of leadership styles on employee’s

outcomes in international luxury hotels. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 469-489. doi:10.1007/s10551-

014-2170-3

[36] Riemen, D.J. (1986). The essential structure of a caring interaction: Doing phenomenology. In P.M.

Munhall & C.J. Oileer (Eds), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (pp.85-105). Norwalk, CT:

Appleton-Century-Crofts.

[37] Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (1993). Research methods for social work. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

[38] Salas E. & Gelfand, M. (2013). Introduction to the special issue: Collaboration in multicultural

environments. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 735-738. doi:10.1002/job.1880

[39] Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

[40] Shawn, Ng. (2018). Hotels mushrooming in Malaysia. Edgeprop.

[41] Smith, J., &Macko, N. (2014). Exploring the relationship between employee engagement and employee

turnover. Ascroft International Business School,6(1), 56-69. Retrieved from http://ebsco.com

[42] Stander, F.W., DeBeer, L.T., & Stander, M.W. (2015). Authentic leadership as a source of optimism, trust

in the organization and work engagement in the public health care sector. Journal of Human Resource

Management, 13(1), 1-12. doi:10.4102/sajhrm.v13il.675

[43] Testa, M.R., &Sipe, L.J. (2012). Service-leadership competencies for hospitality and tourism management.

International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 648-658. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.08.009

[44] Townsend, K., Wilkinson, A., & Burgess, J. (2014). Route to partial success: Collaborative employment

relations and employee engagement. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,

25(2014), 915-930. doi:10.1080109585192.2012.743478

[45] Wong, C.A., &Laschinger, H.K. (2013). Authentic leadership, performance, and job satisfaction: The

mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 947-959. doi:10.1111/j.1365-

2648.2012.06089.x

[46] Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Publications.

Downloads

Published

31.05.2019

How to Cite

Do Leadership and Effective Internal Communication Strategies Really Matters? Insights from MNCs in the Malaysian Hospitality Industry. (2019). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.61841/tkcyvw08