Categorical Representation Of Women As The Second Sex: A Sociolinguistic Study Of Hindi Proverbs As Carriers Of Gender Partisanship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/t69b9314Keywords:
Sexism, Hindi language, Hindi proverbs, Gender inequality, Linguistic relativityAbstract
Language is a perennial part of human existence. Not only is it conducive to our cognitive competence but also renders an insight into its social bearing. It is, therefore, probable for routine concepts to be interpreted differently by speakers of different languages. One such aspect where language influences our consciousness is gender. If gender is continuously asserted in a language, then it could be postulated that employment of that language invariably impacts our thoughts, attitudes and perceptions of women and men.
Proverbs in any language serve as reflective tools that impart codified knowledge about a society and its speakers. They are indeed the mirror images of the socio-cultural norms and beliefs of the society in which that language is being spoken. In the context of the present paper, the numerous proverbs available to us in the Hindi language, in all likelihood, are an outcome of observations made about life over the years and imparted across future generations. A profound review, however, of many of these proverbs would reveal how gender prejudice is both lucidly as well as obscurely practiced in everyday discourse and aids our biased conception of gender that is invidious towards women. The hypothesis of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is the most straightforward sociolinguistic theory in this regard. It puts forward the idea that our thoughts, perceptions and actions are relative to the language we speak. Therefore, the present paper aims at exploring one of the various dimensions of the Hindi language, namely proverbs, with respect to their ability to affect our cognition regarding gender and shape our ideas about femininity and masculinity. Consequently, this paper intends to unveil our skewed cognizance of the female gender by critically examining 10 Hindi proverbs.
Downloads
References
[1].Beauvoir, S. de. (2015). The Second Sex. Vintage Classics.
[2].Bosmajian, H. A. (1972). The Language of Sexism. etc: A Review of General Semantics, 29(3), 305–313.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/42576459.
[3].Coates, J. (1993). Women, Men and Language. London: Longman.
[4].Dutta, H.(n.d.). Hyperonym, Femininity and Power dynamics: Evidence from Indian Languages. Retrieved from
www.academia.edu.
[5].Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University
of Chicago.
[6].Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
[7].Mills, S. (2008). Language and Sexism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[8].Ponyton, C. (1985). Language and Gender: Making the Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[9].Sapir, E. (1929). The Status of Linguistics as a Science. Language, 5(4), 207–214.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
